Picture of the author
Topic :

Camp Statement

Go live Time : 11 June 2022, 09:07 PM
It seems to appear that a system flaw is evidenced by the use of these supportive camp statements for both pro and con statements on the subject of increasing the character limits on camp subject titles.

Where the Con camp has been started and is supported (at the time of this writing) by one person, that vote is counted by the system as a support vote for the parent camp (increasing the char limit). Here again, this writer argues that supportive arguments (or contrary arguments) should be supported in separate pages where no votes apply.

Support Tree for "Flaw evidenced by this use" Camp

( Based on: "" )
Total Support for This Camp (including sub-camps):

No supporters of this camp

Recent Activities

No data

News Feeds

    No News Found