Computational functionalism holds that the mind is a machine that manipulates symbols. Proponents tend to view the brain as a type of Turing machine (Putnam, H. 1960, "Minds and Machines" ). On this view, any device (such as a digital computer) would have a mind by virtue of the operation of the appropriate program.
There is disagreement about whether the nature of the computation is important. Some believe that any Turing machine generating the same outputs from the same inputs as a brain has the same mind. Others argue that internal functioning - the way the calculations are performed - is important so the machine's program would have to work in the same way as the brain in order to instantiate mind.
For a thought-provoking defence of computational functionalism see David Chalmers' article on "minimal computationalism" (http://consc.net/papers/computation.html.)
Support Tree for "Agreement" Camp
Total Support for This Camp (including sub-camps):
Topic Name : Strong functionalism
Namespace : /General/
Current Camp Record
Camp Name : Agreement
Keywords :
Camp About URL :
Camp About Nick Name : No nickname associated
Why can't I object?
To object to this change, you should be a direct supporter of the topic/camp and should have supported it before the change was submitted.
For more information about disagreement, please read topic: https://canonizer.com/topic/132-Help/4-Disagreement