The concept of Intelligent Design certainly raises excellent questions, particularly about the problems of natural selection as an explanation for complex systems. But its alternative answer – life was designed! – isn’t helpful. Or, at least, it’s not scientifically helpful.
Just saying something is "designed" provides no insight into the process by which that took place. Science is about defining that process, and unless Intelligent Designers can provide scientific evidence of an alternative process to evolution, just touting “design” isn’t adequate.
Support Tree for "An Inadequate Theory" Camp
Total Support for This Camp (including sub-camps):
Topic Name : Intelligent Design
Namespace : /General/
Current Camp Record
Camp Name : An Inadequate Theory
Keywords :
Camp About URL :
Camp About Nick Name : No nickname associated
Why can't I object?
To object to this change, you should be a direct supporter of the topic/camp and should have supported it before the change was submitted.
For more information about disagreement, please read topic: https://canonizer.com/topic/132-Help/4-Disagreement