Camp Statement History

Statement :

Dennett's Predictive Bayesian Coding Theory

In 2012, at the "Evolution and Function of Consciousness" conference, the distinguished philosopher Daniel Dennett presented a talk where he talked about "The phenomenal access consciousness distinction". (Talk on YouTube). In that talk, he proposes that consciousness can be explained by "predictive bayesian coding" or Bayes' theorem.

Of course, the human brain is not literally aware of Bayes or his theorem, but we believe that Dennett is essentially asserting that existing techniques for predictive modeling, such as Bayesian inference methods, are sufficient to form consciousness, and that human consciousness is composed of processes that may be considered an analog or approximation of the more precisely correct Bayesian inference. In this camp, we support this notion.

Although he acknowledges in that talk that there are compelling reasons that make people want dualism to be valid, he also asserts that he cannot really understand dualism. We also cannot understand dualism, and we assert that it is not possible to really understand and accept dualism. Dennett argues that Ned Block (a dualist) has inverted reasoning in that "he thinks 'phenomenal' consciousness is the causal bases of access consciousness while in fact it is an effect of access consciousness, not a cause!" (1:05:45). We also believe that 'phenomenal' things are emergent from consciousness, that nothing phenomenal is necessary to form consciousness, and that nothing phenomenal can exist outside of consciousness.

Statement :

Dennett's Predictive Bayesian Coding Theory

In 2012, at the "Evolution and Function of Consciousness" conference, the distinguished philosopher Daniel Dennett presented a talk where he talked about "The phenomenal access consciousness distinction". (Talk on YouTube). In that talk, he proposes that consciousness can be explained by "predictive bayesian coding" or Bayes' theorem.
Of course, the human brain is not literally aware of Bayes or his theorem, but we believe that Dennett is essentially asserting that existing techniques for predictive modeling, such as Bayesian inference methods, are sufficient to form consciousness, and that human consciousness is composed of processes that may be considered an analog or approximation of the more precisely correct Bayesian inference. In this camp, we support this notion.
Although he acknowledges in that talk that there are compelling reasons that make people want dualism to be valid, he also asserts that he cannot really understand dualism. We also cannot understand dualism, and we assert that it is not possible to really understand and accept dualism. Dennett argues that Ned Block (a dualist) has inverted reasoning in that "he thinks 'phenomenal' consciousness is the causal bases of access consciousness while in fact it is an effect of access consciousness, not a cause!" (1:05:45). We also believe that 'phenomenal' things are emergent from consciousness, that nothing phenomenal is necessary to form consciousness, and that nothing phenomenal can exist outside of consciousness.

Statement :

Dennett's Predictive Bayesian Coding Theory

In the early 90's the distinguished philosopher Daniel Dennett was very involved in the consciousness debate. In addition to many published papers, his "Multiple Drafts" theory was described in his book: "Consciousness Explained". Then, for a time, he "lost interest in the topic." Some people assumed, from his silence, that he was conceding to dualistic theories of consciousness. However, in 2012, at the "Evolution and Function of Consciousness" conference he presented a talk where he talked about "The phenomenal access consciousness distinction". (Talk on YouTube).
He pointed out that his critics didn't lose interest, that his loss of interest was possibly a "tactical mistake" (6:00) and that he was now interested in returning to the debate. In that talk he summarized an updated version of his theory documented here.
In that talk he points out that he understands and admits to the powerful arguments for dualism (12:00) but exhorts us to resist them. He demonstrates and focuses his discussion around an after image of red which is obviously not on the screen, nor on the retina. So in this talk he asks and focuses on what the emerging expert consensus agrees is the most important part of consciousness, and the focus of this survey topic: What, Where and How, is this redness after image. He coined the term "Quining Qualia" where he argues that even though we know it exists, we should ignore it.
Dennett argues that Ned Block has inverted reasoning and that "He thinks 'phenomenal' consciousness is the causal bases of access consciousness while in fact it is an effect of access consciousness, not a cause!" (1:05:45) And ultimately predicts that this effect emerges via Predictive Bayesian Coding. Dennett points out, in that video, that qualia are achieved via the predictive powers of the bayes algorithm. He points out that he doesn't have time to explain it in more detail, in the video, and provides multiple references to find out more. And of course, you can google for the term "predictive bayesian coding" or bayes theorem.