Topic: recycle this topic

Camp: Agreement / Physician Assisted Suicide

Camp Statement History

Objected
Live
In Review
Old
Statement :

Physician Assisted Suicide


https://canonizer.com/files/PAS.jpeg
Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?

Here is a paper on the issue: Ethics in physician-assisted dying and euthanasia

Every candidate and every political party who fields candidates for public office should both have and publish their position on this camp topic (Physician Assisted Suicide) as a condition for public support, so people know how the candidate proposes to represent them, and they (the people) can hold him (shorthand for all genders) accountable for how their actual representation and votes compare to what their campaign position on this topic was.

Please consider the topic (Physician Assisted Suicide) for which you believe some position should be part of the platform you support.

The point here is to indicate that some position on this topic should be included in a party's platform. Not to indicate, here, what that particular position on the topic is. You can weigh in on specific positions where the links to do that indicate.

Edit summary : Update title and instructions
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : Brannock
Go live Time :
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide
https://canonizer.com/files/PAS.jpeg
Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?

Here is a paper on the issue: Ethics in physician-assisted dying and euthanasia

Every candidate and every political party who fields candidates for public office should both have and publish their position on this camp topic (Physician Assisted Suicide) as a condition for public support, so people know how the candidate proposes to represent them, and they (the people) can hold him (shorthand for all genders) accountable for how their actual representation and votes compare to what their campaign position on this topic was.

Edit summary :
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : Brannock
Go live Time :
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide
https://canonizer.com/files/PAS.jpeg
Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?

Here is a paper on the issue: Ethics in physician-assisted dying and euthanasia

Every candidate and every political party who fields candidates for public office should both have and publish their position on this camp topic as a condition for public support, so people know how the candidate proposes to represent them, and they (the people) can hold him (shorthand for all genders) accountable for how their actual representation and votes compare to what their campaign position on this topic was.

Edit summary :
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : Brannock
Go live Time :
Object Reason : Push duplicate info to parent camps.
Objector Nick Name : Brent_Allsop
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide
https://canonizer.com/files/PAS.jpeg
Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?

Here is a paper on the issue: Ethics in physician-assisted dying and euthanasia

Edit summary : Added photo
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : KC
Go live Time :
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide

Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?

Here is a paper on the issue: Ethics in physician-assisted dying and euthanasia

Edit summary : Make the reference a link
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : Brent_Allsop
Go live Time :
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide

Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?
https://pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/561/1236

Edit summary :
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : KC
Go live Time :
Statement : Physician Assisted Suicide

Proponents argue that physician-assisted dying is a more respectful and dignified way for terminally ill patients to die. However, opponents claim that physician-assisted dying devalues human life, which should be treasured and protected.

What do you think?
https://pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/561/1236

Edit summary :
Submitted on :
Submitter Nick Name : KC
Go live Time :