Brent_Allsop replied 14 years ago (Feb 28th 2010, 12:13:36 am)
Thanks for the improvements to this camp and the statement.
I don't know how 'resurrection' and stuff got in there, nice to get them fixed.
There are just a few things that I think are moving a bit in the wrong direction. For example, you changed one vs zero to "patterns of ones and zeroes". and you also say what results from these patterns is "completely automatic" and so on.
To me, the only critical and simple issue is that a one vs a zero is very different from a red vs green. So if you add more than just one bit, and start talking about things that are 'automatic' (why is what we do not 'automatic'?) and so on, you start distracting people from the core simple and trivial issue.
But that all is just a nit pick, so in general I'm good with the changes and think they are an improvement.