Given the explanation, I agree that the method is the best shot we could hope for affixing a "good enough" label to it. I'm unable to find the statement that I objected (softly) to, so I'm not sure if it's something that could be fixed with words for reading by future skeptics, without the need for personal intervention to expand on the details. At the same time, I'm always hesitant to suggest more words because that's my personal downfall, too many words. XD
This thread doesn't really help me get to exactly the thing I objected to -- I'm pretty sure that even though I asked a question, I still voted in support of the statement, but now I'm not so sure.
I just noticed that you objected to the statement we submitted for this
camp. With stated reason: How can objective
evaluation of expertise be based on popular vote?
Thanks for the participation, but I have a few problems with this.
I'm going to resubmit this, given the above explanation of how we can get what you want, without destroying what other's want.