Thank you, Brent for giving us the opportunity in keeping our design proposal in front. 

We are here to work as a team, and I do not want to object to the thought process of anyone. I have gone ahead and added my design proposal here: Design Architecture by Iffort. In addition, I have added the link to this camp statement in the main consensus camp.

We can start our discussion by considering both designs and finally reach a point where parts of both designs can be merged into a final one.

Oh great, it looks like Rohit with Talentelgia has already proposed this change.

There may be an issue with this, as Sunny with Iffort, was the first to propose the Iffort design to the main consensus camp for this, however someone objected to his proposal.  So in my mind, Since he was the first to propose a design for this, I think he should have the right to do that.  So, Sunny, if you would like to do something like object to this proposed design, and then work to build consensus between your design and this design, I would vote to do that.  Or if Sunny, and the Iffort team are ok with this design, we can just move forward with it, making any changes they, or anyone else whish to propose for this currently live draft of a design.

I haven't had a chance to review both designs in detail, so still need to do that, before I can know which one is best, and am starting that review process now.

Rohit_Talentelgia has started a great Scalability Architecture topic to build consensus around a design for that.  If there are no objections, I’m going to add a link to this topic in the statement for this camp.